lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 16 Jul 2008 12:33:12 +0800
FromHerbert Xu <>
SubjectRe: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000000000000e (reset_prng_context)
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 09:25:49PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:07:01 +0800 Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 03:11:10PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > Except that such a high density of coding-style errors is an indication
> > > that the code was not closely and critically reviewed by an experienced
> > > kernel developer.
> > > 
> > > > Every damn single warning in this case is about whitespace or 80 column limit.
> > > > 
> > > > Every damn single one!
> > 
> > Indeed, I apologise for reviewing the code on a monitor that is wider
> > than yours.  If only we could make sure that all Linux developers
> > used smaller monitors then the code quality would surely improve!
> > 
> 
> Remaining within 80 cols is a big deal indeed for those who choose to
> use, or who are forced to use 80-col displays.  Try resizing to 70 cols
> for a while, see how you get on.

Sure, I totally understand the 80-column requirement and support
it too.

However, I fail to see how one could draw the conclusion that a
piece of code that breaks the 80-column rule has not been closely
or critically reviewed.

Excuse me for not focusing on white-space or code-width issues
when reviewing code.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-16 06:35    [from the cache]
©2003-2008