[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in-kernel, use it in more drivers.
Hi Frans,

> > On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >> IMO the newly added /inability/ to build firmware into kernel modules
> >> is a clear regression.
> >
> > IMO you're being stupid.
> >
> > How about explainign why it makes any difference what-so-ever?
> >
> > If you can load the module, you can load the firmware. Claiming anything
> > else is just _stupid_.
> Sure, in theory it's that simple. Here's a concrete example that shows how
> things are harder in practice.
> I use the 'make deb-pkg' target (from scripts/package) to build my Debian
> kernel packages from git. So that needs to be adapted to include
> /lib/firmware. No real problem so far.
> So then I build 2.6.27-rc1 and install it. Great.
> You release 2.6.27-rc2 and I build it. Ouch! It fails to install, at least
> if I want to install it _alongside_ 2.6.27-rc1 or other kernels (which I
> do!). Why does it fail? Because dpkg's package management does not allow
> one package to overwrite files already "owned" by another package.
> So, how is this solved by Debian for already existing firmware packages?
> Basically by making a separate package for each firmware file (or
> driver). This works because there are not too many of them, but having a
> huge number of tiny packages is a nightmare by itself.
> But anyway, the dep-pkg target will have to be made smarter than it is now
> if it's to deal with this [1]. And at least currently it is broken.
> If I were able to compile firmware into the modules, the problem would be
> solved in one go.
> I don't know how the Debian kernel team plans to deal with this for distro
> kernel packages. They probably _do_ want to keep them separate [2]. Maybe
> by grouping firmware for really common drivers into
> firmware-basic-drivers or something along those lines.
> Cheers,
> [1] Only quick solution I see is to have it install the firmware in a
> versioned directory and have the postinst copy things from there to
> /lib/firmware.

using /lib/firmware/`uname -r`/ is actually not a bad idea. You only
have to fix udev to actually include this in the list of directories to
look for firmware files. Also Ubuntu is already doing this.



 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-15 21:23    [W:0.227 / U:2.572 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site