lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?


On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> Or you could just do it like emacs or Solaris and simply use a single number.

No, that would be horrible. The only point of changign the numbering would
be to make the numbers smaller. Not fewer. I don't like "26" much as a
version number, I'd like "131" even less.

So I'd much rather have something like "2.9.1" than "27", just because
it's a hierarchy of simpler numbers.

Linus


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-15 17:23    [W:1.142 / U:0.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site