Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:11:55 -0700 | From | Suresh Siddha <> | Subject | [patch 1/3] x2apic: uninline uv_init_apic_ldr() |
| |
Andrew says: > There's no point in declaring it inline if it's always called indirectly.
And point taken!
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> ---
Index: tree-x86/arch/x86/kernel/genx2apic_uv_x.c =================================================================== --- tree-x86.orig/arch/x86/kernel/genx2apic_uv_x.c 2008-07-11 10:58:31.000000000 -0700 +++ tree-x86/arch/x86/kernel/genx2apic_uv_x.c 2008-07-11 11:03:45.000000000 -0700 @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ return 1; } -static inline void uv_init_apic_ldr(void) +static void uv_init_apic_ldr(void) { } --
| |