[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86_64: fix delayed signals

On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > But if you really want that behaviour, then re-introducing the loop would
> > likely be the better approach (or should be combined), since I think you
> > effectively just re-introduced it (at a much bigger granularity).
> I don't think so. Firstly, TIF_SIGPENDING is not the only flag in
> question. There are other reasons to re-enter do_notify_resume().
> If those are set during signal processing et al, they should take
> effect before going back to user mode.

You're ignoring the background question - we expressly _stopped_ doing
this long ago. So the real issue was the ".. if you really .." part.

Do we really? What's the actual downside here?


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-11 00:55    [W:0.072 / U:6.400 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site