[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86_64: fix delayed signals

    On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Roland McGrath wrote:
    > > But if you really want that behaviour, then re-introducing the loop would
    > > likely be the better approach (or should be combined), since I think you
    > > effectively just re-introduced it (at a much bigger granularity).
    > I don't think so. Firstly, TIF_SIGPENDING is not the only flag in
    > question. There are other reasons to re-enter do_notify_resume().
    > If those are set during signal processing et al, they should take
    > effect before going back to user mode.

    You're ignoring the background question - we expressly _stopped_ doing
    this long ago. So the real issue was the ".. if you really .." part.

    Do we really? What's the actual downside here?


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-07-11 00:55    [W:0.019 / U:0.632 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site