[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86: more header fixes

    * Vegard Nossum <> wrote:

    > > or perhaps we could include it in tip/master right now as well, if
    > > you did another branch that excluded the files below. That would
    > > make merging a lot easier - and we could do a second phase in
    > > v2.6.27-rc1. Hm?
    > I don't think we really need to resolve conflicts at all. What we can
    > do is simply to re-run the scripts against tip/master whenever you
    > want the update.

    ok, lets do it that way.

    > Also, by the way: Can -tip now be cloned with --shared to save space
    > as long as I only have branches with references to commits in
    > tip/master? Or is this still to be considered unsafe?

    it's unsafe if we ever rewind a commit that you rely on later, and
    git-gc zaps it from tip.git?

    i think it would be better to not rely on that yet. The overwhelming
    majority of activities in tip.git are append-only, but the integration
    branches (which are included in tip/master) get regenerated frequently.
    If you base on a topic branch itself (say tip/x86/nmi) - that should be
    pretty stable.


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-07-01 11:31    [W:0.022 / U:1.684 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site