Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 9 Jun 2008 10:12:53 -0700 | From | Chris Wright <> | Subject | Re: [stable] Missing patch from stable [3/7] |
| |
* Miklos Szeredi (mszeredi@suse.cz) wrote: > On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 14:29 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Well, you know the implications of leaving these known bugs open more than > > me. If you think some of them are really not needed, I'm fine with this, > > but some definitely fix real bugs (judging by the code and the comments). > > Yeah. Perhaps there should also be a rule, that -stable patches for > EXPERIMENTAL stuff (like ecryptfs) are automatically rejected. And then > they wouldn't increase the workload for the people collecting/reviewing > the stable series.
Both users and distros enable code marked EXPERIMENTAL. It's not that uncommon for code to get stuck in EXPERIMENTAL long after it's in general use.
thanks, -chris
| |