[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] memcg: hierarchy support (v3)
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 01:59:32 -0700
"Paul Menage" <> wrote:

> Hi Kame,
> I like the idea of keeping the kernel simple, and moving more of the
> intelligence to userspace.

> It may need the kernel to expose a bit more in the way of VM details,
> such as memory pressure, OOM notifications, etc, but as long as
> userspace can respond quickly to memory imbalance, it should work
> fine. We're doing something a bit similar using cpusets and fake NUMA
> at Google - the principle of juggling memory between cpusets is the
> same, but the granularity is much worse :-)
yes, next problem is adding interfaces. but we have to investigate
what is principal.

> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:58 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
> <> wrote:
> > - supported hierarchy_model parameter.
> > Now, no_hierarchy and hardwall_hierarchy is implemented.
> Should we try to support hierarchy and non-hierarchy cgroups in the
> same tree? Maybe we should just enforce the restrictions that:
> - the hierarchy mode can't be changed on a cgroup if you have children
> or any non-zero usage/limit
> - a cgroup inherits its parent's hierarchy mode.
Ah, my patch does it (I think). explanation is bad.

- mem cgroup's mode can be changed against ROOT node which has no children.
- a child inherits parent's mode.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-06-04 11:13    [W:0.174 / U:2.240 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site