[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/4] x86_64: Fold pda into per cpu area
Mike Travis wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> Mike Travis wrote:
>>> * Declare the pda as a per cpu variable.
>>> * Make the x86_64 per cpu area start at zero.
>>> * Since the pda is now the first element of the per_cpu area, cpu_pda()
>>> is no longer needed and per_cpu() can be used instead. This also
>>> makes
>>> the _cpu_pda[] table obsolete.
>>> * Since %gs is pointing to the pda, it will then also point to the
>>> per cpu
>>> variables and can be accessed thusly:
>>> %gs:[&per_cpu_xxxx - __per_cpu_start]
> The above is only a partial story (I folded the two patches but didn't
> update the comments correctly.] The variables are already offset from
> __per_cpu_start by virtue of the .data.percpu section being based at
> zero. Therefore only the %gs register needs to be set to the base of
> each cpu's percpu section to resolve the target address:
> %gs:&per_cpu_xxxx

Oh, good. I'd played with trying to make that work at one point, and
got lost in linker bugs and/or random version-specific strangeness.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-06-04 16:01    [W:0.079 / U:1.032 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site