lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sched: Give cpusets exclusive control over sched domains (ie remove cpu_isolated_map)
I'll NAQ this one.

As a result of the separate lkml thread:

Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may have realtime uses)

and as a result of there not yet being a good reason -to- remove this,
other than a few kernel developers who don't like it, I conclude that
we should not just remove the "isolcpus=" feature.

It might be that we should deprecate it, as I have suggested in the
past. But I'm not now seeing even a good reason for that.

--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-06-04 02:51    [W:0.101 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site