lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 59/60] microblaze_v4: syscall_table.S and unistd.h
    Arnd Bergmann wrote:
    >
    > You still set __NR_fork. There is no point defining the number if you
    > can't actually call the syscall in the first place.
    >

    Worse, it is actively *harmful* to set the number; klibc or anything
    that uses similar kinds of scripts for portability will see the symbol
    and think the system call is available.

    -hpa


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-06-26 20:25    [W:4.022 / U:1.224 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site