[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/6] Extend completions to provide XFS object flush requirements
    On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 05:26:12AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
    > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 02:41:12PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
    > > XFS object flushing doesn't quite match existing completion semantics. It
    > > mixed exclusive access with completion. That is, we need to mark an object as
    > > being flushed before flushing it to disk, and then block any other attempt to
    > > flush it until the completion occurs.
    > This sounds like mutex semantics. Why are the existing mutexes not
    > appropriate for your needs?

    Different threads doing wait and complete.


    Dave Chinner

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-06-26 13:35    [W:0.039 / U:13.328 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site