lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] fix to putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling rework v3
    From
    Date
    On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 02:35 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
    > > 'lru' was not being set to 'UNEVICTABLE when page was, in fact,
    > > unevictable [really "nonreclaimable" :-)], so retry would never
    > > happen, and culled pages never counted.
    > >
    > > Also, redundant mem_cgroup_move_lists()--one with incorrect 'lru',
    > > in the case of unevictable pages--messes up memcontroller tracking [I think].
    >
    > indeed.
    > sorry, I forgot to send this fix.
    >
    > Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
    >
    > but I still happend panic on usex and nishimura-san's cpuset migration test.
    > -> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=121375647720110&w=2
    >

    I saw the description of the cpuset migration test. Have you wrapped
    this in a script suitable for running under usex? If so, I would like
    to get a copy. Actually, please send me any automation you have for
    this test and I'll incorporate it into the usex load. Meanwhile, I'll
    take a cut at adding such a test to the load. However, we know that
    your version can provoke the panic, so I'd like to get that.

    >
    > I'll investigate it tommorow.

    Later, then,
    Lee





    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-06-24 19:51    [W:0.024 / U:179.476 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site