lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: nanosleep() uses CLOCK_MONOTONIC, should be CLOCK_REALTIME?
>> nor by adjtimex() (this last one is used by ntpd).
>
> That surprised me a little. So gradual adjustments to the time made
> by adjtime() / adjtimex() really don't affect nanosleep()?

Does the adjtime() system call still exist ? I could not find any
information about this system call in the 2.6.25 kernel source code.

Frequency adjustments made via the adjtimex() system call do affect
nanosleep() of course (via timex::freq and/or timex::tick). Stepwise
time adjustments, whether gradual or not, should not affect
nanosleep().

Bart.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-06-24 11:31    [W:0.048 / U:0.356 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site