[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: nanosleep() uses CLOCK_MONOTONIC, should be CLOCK_REALTIME?
    >> nor by adjtimex() (this last one is used by ntpd).
    > That surprised me a little. So gradual adjustments to the time made
    > by adjtime() / adjtimex() really don't affect nanosleep()?

    Does the adjtime() system call still exist ? I could not find any
    information about this system call in the 2.6.25 kernel source code.

    Frequency adjustments made via the adjtimex() system call do affect
    nanosleep() of course (via timex::freq and/or timex::tick). Stepwise
    time adjustments, whether gradual or not, should not affect


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-06-24 11:31    [W:0.039 / U:74.480 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site