Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | [PATCH 1/3] h8300: Use packed struct rather than memmove for unaligned access | From | Harvey Harrison <> | Date | Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:28:58 -0700 |
| |
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> --- There are only 3 arches that use the memmove implementation, do you see any problems with using the packed struct implementation so the memmove version could be removed?
include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h b/include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h index b8d06c7..ab851e7 100644 --- a/include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h +++ b/include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ #ifndef _ASM_H8300_UNALIGNED_H #define _ASM_H8300_UNALIGNED_H -#include <linux/unaligned/be_memmove.h> +#include <linux/unaligned/be_struct.h> #include <linux/unaligned/le_byteshift.h> #include <linux/unaligned/generic.h> -- 1.5.6.290.gc4e15
| |