lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [stable] [patch 4/5] x86: use BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE on 32-bit
    On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:09:40AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    >
    > * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
    >
    > > On Sun, 22 Jun 2008, Greg KH wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > You will also need the patch from http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/21/103 to
    > > > > make sure reserve_bootmem() is not void (*)().
    > > >
    > > > Ok, let me know when that goes into Linus's tree please.
    > >
    > > It already is: 71c2742f5e6348d76ee62085cf0a13e5eff0f00e.

    Thanks, I'll go add that one as well.

    > thanks. This patch (which was not a build fix but an infrastructure fix
    > that the kexec fix in arch/x86 depended on) is well-tested as well, it
    > was queued in -tip on June 10th:
    >
    > | commit 91d48fc80f22817332170082e10de60a75851640
    > | Author: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
    > | Date: Sun Jun 8 15:46:29 2008 +0200
    > | CommitDate: Tue Jun 10 14:41:56 2008 +0200
    > |
    > | bootmem: add return value to reserve_bootmem_node()
    > |
    > | This patch changes the function reserve_bootmem_node() from void to
    > | int, returning -ENOMEM if the allocation fails.
    > |
    > | Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
    > | Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
    >
    > so it is a -stable candidate just as much as the kexec fix. (These are
    > all fixes for long-standing problems so i guess it can go all the way
    > back to all stable kernels that are being maintained.)

    Hm, but it's not in Linus's tree yet, so I can't take it for stable at
    this time :(

    thanks,

    greg k-h


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-06-23 21:33    [W:0.068 / U:0.068 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site