Messages in this thread | | | From | Denys Vlasenko <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), list | Date | Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:12:30 +0200 |
| |
On Monday 23 June 2008 20:57, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > I agree. And if we do want to pay attention to pure code size, there are > > > other approaches -- like --gc-sections > > > > I have some patches in this area too. Were submitted to Sam > > but he was too busy it seems. > > They were not trivial to apply and so went down on the TODO list.
I realize that they were not trivial to review, but that was unavoidable. They were even more not trivial to create.
> We could try to push the generic and x86 specific .lds stuff via > the arch maintainers?
IIRC I splitted the entire GC collection patch in a way that first patches were doing exactly this easier first part and I hoped that at least these first patches will be taken. They were big, but somewhat trivial, from "it's obviously safe" department.
Had they been applied, now making --gc-sections to work would be easier. -- vda
| |