Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:04:40 +0400 | From | Cyrill Gorcunov <> | Subject | Re: nmi_watchdog suspicious |
| |
[Maciej W. Rozycki - Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 02:54:38AM +0100] | On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: | | > If you mean the case we get NMI physical line assetred while configuring APIC | > (ie nmi watchdog is not properly configured yet) then I wonder why we has | > this checking at all... | | Hmm, I am not sure what you mean -- nmi_watchdog_tick() can be called | potentially at any time, and you can receive NMIs from sources other than | the watchdog; the latters would set bits in the Port B at 0x61 in most | cases though. Anyway using a separate variable such as | "nmi_watchdog_active" would be cleaner. | | Maciej |
ok, thanks Maciej, i'll take a look on this.
- Cyrill -
| |