Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:19:31 +0400 | From | Dmitry <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] MFD maintainer |
| |
2008/6/19 pHilipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com>: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Dmitry <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 2008/6/19 ian <spyro@f2s.com>: >>> On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 15:12 +0400, Dmitry wrote: >>> >>>> > I'll tidy up the code and pop a branch on my git server for people to >>>> > review, if thats what people want. >>>> >>>> It's better to send patches to some ML. >>> >>> Well, the code I had is updated to match linus -git branch >>> eseries_release7 if anyones curious. (no real changes since last time >>> though) >>> >>>> > Dmitry - if you have any pending patches now is the time to send them on >>>> > over ;-) >>>> >>>> Actually the code I'm using has diverged a bit from the last code I've >>>> sent before this merging pulse. >>> >>> All progress is good :) >>> >>>> As you have seen, I've tried to submit parts of the core and tmio-nand >>>> driver as a start. >>> >>> Has any of that got merged yet? If so, I'll adapt my strategy to match >>> that, otherwise I'll try to keep all the drivers in parallel. >>> >>>> Then I'd suggest to merge other tmio core bits (support for tc6387xb >>>> and t7l66xb). The MMC, usb and fb cell drivers could benefit from >>>> clocklib patches I'm trying to get in. >>> >>> I'd like to see those. I'll get MMC and USB updated ASAP. >>> >>> have you solved the clock-api-tied-to-platform-architecture problem ? >> >> There were plenty of tries to merge clocklib. Check lkml archives. > > How could we stir up some interest in those patches again? The last > round didn't receive any comments. >
I don't know :( Maybe I shoud give up the idea of using kobjects, switch back to kref and do a partial merge of those two patchset branches. I'll think about it this weekend.
-- With best wishes Dmitry
| |