Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:04:49 +0200 | | From | Nicolas Ferre <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/7] mmc: at91_mci: rework to allow better transfer |
| |
Pierre Ossman : > On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:54:41 +0200 > Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> wrote: > >> Russell King highlights that patch #4 is not well inserted in the series >> : it have to be after #5 (after correcting bytes_xfered update). >> >> If you want I can reorder them... or you manage to do it. >> >> I will take into account Marc's comment and new Ville patch series in >> another round ;-) > > Will you redo this series, or are you planning further patches? (i.e. > should I merge this set or wait for an update?)
You can merge this patch series (7 patches)
You can also merge http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20080610.092729.beef9e64.en.html "at91_mci: manage cmd error and data error independently" (1 patch)
And 3 patches from Ville Syrjälä that I have just signed: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20080614.172720.dd0e776e.en.html "at91_mci: AT91SAM9260/9263 12 byte write erratum (v2)"
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20080609.190644.3f64ff91.en.html "at91_mci: Cover more AT91RM9200 and AT91SAM9261 errata."
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20080609.190645.2998e511.en.html "at91_mci: Fix byte mode transitions."
=> 11 patches.
Thanks a lot, regards, -- Nicolas Ferre
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |