lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
SubjectRe: 2.6.26-rc5-mm3
FromDaniel Walker <>
DateWed, 18 Jun 2008 10:55:51 -0700
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 00:32 +0100, Byron Bradley wrote:
> Looks like x86 and ARM both fail to boot if PROFILE_LIKELY, FTRACE and 
> DYNAMIC_FTRACE are selected. If any one of those three are disabled it 
> boots (or fails in some other way which I'm looking at now). The serial 
> console output from both machines when they fail to boot is below, let me 
> know if there is any other information I can provide.

I was able to reproduce a hang on x86 with those options. The patch
below is a potential fix. I think we don't want to trace
do_check_likely(), since the ftrace internals might use likely/unlikely
macro's which will just cause recursion back to do_check_likely()..

Signed-off-by: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>

---
 lib/likely_prof.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6.25/lib/likely_prof.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25.orig/lib/likely_prof.c
+++ linux-2.6.25/lib/likely_prof.c
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
 
 static struct likeliness *likeliness_head;
 
-int do_check_likely(struct likeliness *likeliness, unsigned int ret)
+int notrace do_check_likely(struct likeliness *likeliness, unsigned int ret)
 {
 	static unsigned long likely_lock;
 



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-06-18 19:59    [from the cache]
©2003-2008