Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:31:34 +1000 | From | Dave Chinner <> | Subject | Re: XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1163 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c |
| |
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 05:50:06PM +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 13:28 +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 13:08 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:27:09AM +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > > > > > > Linux transit5.news.xs4all.nl 2.6.25.6 #1 SMP Wed Jun 11 10:59:10 CEST > > > > 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > > > > > > > Filesystem "sda4": XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1163 of > > > > file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c. Caller 0xffffffff880f1315 > > > > Pid: 3402, comm: diablo Not tainted 2.6.25.6 #1 > > > > > > This commit in 2.6.26 will probably fix it. > > > > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=75de2a91c98a6f486f261c1367fe59f5583e15a3 > > > > "At ENOSPC, we can get a filesystem shutdown due to a cancelling a dirty > > transaction in xfs_mkdir or xfs_create." > > > > But The filesystem is only used for 35%. It might have hit 100% somewhere in > > the recent past though (a few reboots ago). > > I've applied the patch to 2.6.25.6 just in case, I'll let it run over > > the weekend to see what happens. > > Well, the box has been up for 3 days now. When this problem first > appeared it only stayed up for a day max, so I'm reasonably positive > it's fixed.
Cool.
> The patch applies cleanly to 2.6.25.6 - perhaps it should go into > -stable.
For a bug that's been around for more than 3 years and reported by only a handful of ppl? I'd prefer not to....
Cheers,
Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com
| |