![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 15:56 +0930, David Newall wrote: > Németh Márton wrote: > > # define DPRINTK(fmt, args...) \ > > - printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: " fmt, __FUNCTION__ , ## args) > > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: " fmt, __func__ , ## args) > > > > Why change __FUNCTION__ to __func__? I don't even know where __func__ > come from? Assuming that it isn't totally broken, and I'll believe that > it isn't, then would it be compiler-specific? __FUNCTION__ is standard > and that's more than enough reason to prefer that form to any > non-standard variation. __FUNCTION__ is gcc-specific, __func__ is C99. Harvey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-06-15 08:53 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||