![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread
|
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.25, please let me know > either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the > entries below are invalid. http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/14/62 was just reported today. Seems to have been caused by commit 3ac7fe5a4aab409bd5674d0b070bce97f9d20872 Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Date: Wed Apr 30 00:55:01 2008 -0700 infrastructure to debug (dynamic) objects which was introduced just after v2.6.25, but not discovered until now, probably because it requires the (admittedly obscure) combination of lockdep and slub/object debugging. Vegard -- "The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation." -- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036 | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-06-15 00:13 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||