Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:05:29 -0700 | | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] HP iLO driver |
| |
Altobelli, David wrote: >> Wouldn't /dev/hpilo/ccbN be a more appropriate namespace? > > Yes, that would be more clear. The code is currently defined to a maximum of 1 hardware device, but this could change, and the dev path should probably reflect that. > > How do you feel about /dev/hpiloX/ccbN, where X is 0, 1, ... Num_Devices-1?
I'd rather see /dev/hpilo/dXcY, the point being to try to declutter the /dev root.
-hpa
|  |