[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] HP iLO driver
    Altobelli, David wrote:
    >> Wouldn't /dev/hpilo/ccbN be a more appropriate namespace?
    > Yes, that would be more clear. The code is currently defined to a maximum of 1 hardware device, but this could change, and the dev path should probably reflect that.
    > How do you feel about /dev/hpiloX/ccbN, where X is 0, 1, ... Num_Devices-1?

    I'd rather see /dev/hpilo/dXcY, the point being to try to declutter the
    /dev root.


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-06-12 23:09    [W:0.020 / U:38.972 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site