lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [sched-devel, patch-rfc] rework of "prioritize non-migratable tasks over migratable ones"
From
Date
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 00:58 +0200, Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> Hi Gregory,
>
>
> regarding this commit: 45c01e824991b2dd0a332e19efc4901acb31209f
>
>
> I think we can do it simpler. Please take a look at the patch below.
>
> Instead of having 2 separate arrays (which is + ~800 bytes on x86_32 and twice so on x86_64),
> let's add "exclusive" (the ones that are bound to this CPU) tasks to the head of the queue
> and "shared" ones -- to the end.
>
> In case of a few newly woken up "exclusive" tasks, they are 'stacked' (not queued as now), meaning that
> a task {i+1} is being placed in front of the previously woken up task {i}. But I don't think that
> this behavior may cause any realistic problems.

Doesn't this violate POSIX ?



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-06-11 10:59    [W:0.061 / U:0.224 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site