Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:10:58 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: Fwd: [patch (for 2.6.26?) 1/1] cifs: fix oops on mount when CONFIG_CIFS_DFS_UPCALL is enabled |
| |
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:14:26 -0500 "Steve French" <smfrench@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: "Steve French" <smfrench@gmail.com>
argh. smfrench@gmail.com == sfrench@us.ibm.com == sfrench@samba.org.
This always bugs me because I never know which is preferred, most reliable, least likely to get mangled, etc.
> To: "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@redhat.com>, marcin.slusarz@gmail.com, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> > Subject: Fwd: [patch (for 2.6.26?) 1/1] cifs: fix oops on mount when CONFIG_CIFS_DFS_UPCALL is enabled > Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:14:26 -0500 > > I don't have the original note (ie patch without whitespace mangled by > the mailers) that I can ack to Linus on this but would like it merged > into mainline as an individual patch (my cifs-2.6.git tree has > additional patches in it that I don't want to merged into > linux-2.6.git yet). >
I'll send this on to Linus and stable@kernel.org in my next batch.
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com> > Date: Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:47 AM > Subject: Re: [patch (for 2.6.26?) 1/1] cifs: fix oops on mount when > CONFIG_CIFS_DFS_UPCALL is enabled > To: akpm@linux-foundation.org > Cc: sfrench@us.ibm.com, marcin.slusarz@gmail.com, sfrench@samba.org, > stable@kernel.org > > ACK
Please don't top-post. It really does make it hard to keep things vaguely coherent?
| |