lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Fwd: [patch (for 2.6.26?) 1/1] cifs: fix oops on mount when CONFIG_CIFS_DFS_UPCALL is enabled
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:14:26 -0500
"Steve French" <smfrench@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: "Steve French" <smfrench@gmail.com>

argh. smfrench@gmail.com == sfrench@us.ibm.com == sfrench@samba.org.

This always bugs me because I never know which is preferred, most
reliable, least likely to get mangled, etc.


> To: "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@redhat.com>, marcin.slusarz@gmail.com, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Subject: Fwd: [patch (for 2.6.26?) 1/1] cifs: fix oops on mount when CONFIG_CIFS_DFS_UPCALL is enabled
> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:14:26 -0500
>
> I don't have the original note (ie patch without whitespace mangled by
> the mailers) that I can ack to Linus on this but would like it merged
> into mainline as an individual patch (my cifs-2.6.git tree has
> additional patches in it that I don't want to merged into
> linux-2.6.git yet).
>

I'll send this on to Linus and stable@kernel.org in my next batch.

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [patch (for 2.6.26?) 1/1] cifs: fix oops on mount when
> CONFIG_CIFS_DFS_UPCALL is enabled
> To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
> Cc: sfrench@us.ibm.com, marcin.slusarz@gmail.com, sfrench@samba.org,
> stable@kernel.org
>
> ACK

Please don't top-post. It really does make it hard to keep things
vaguely coherent?



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-06-10 23:13    [W:0.049 / U:0.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site