![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* markus reichelt (ml@mareichelt.de) wrote: > * Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> wrote: > > On Mon, 09 Jun 2008, Chris Wright wrote:> > > We (the -stable team) are announcing the release of the 2.6.25.6 > > > kernel.> > > > > > It contains a number of assorted bugfixes all over the tree. Users are > > > encouraged to update.> > > > It also contains at least one security bugfix, as some were quick > > to point out in not-so-kind words:> > > > http://lwn.net/Articles/285438/ > > I agree that security bugfixes should be pointed out more clearly. I don't think anybody is disagreeing with that. It's not always obvious to bug submitters or fixers what the security implications are. While Brad has a good point, esp. w.r.t. the specific cpufreq bug he picked out having security implications, it is not true that we are actively hiding security bugs. Had I realized there was a security issue, I would highlight it in the announce message. In fact, that's our standard procedure for -stable. thanks, -chris | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-06-10 22:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||