lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: sysbench+mysql(oltp, readonly) 30% regression with 2.6.26-rc1
From
Date

On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 10:10 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 09:59 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 09:50 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 09:32 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 08:51 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > > > > > -rc1. Do you have the fix below applied?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Oooh - good catch, that seems to be a post -rc1 merge.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes this is required.
> > > > >
> > > > > > With below patch+previous_fix_weight_calc, the result is improved, but is still
> > > > > > about 10% worse than the one of pure 2.6.26-rc1.
> > > > > > Number of threads: 16
> > > > > > read/write requests: 6104336 (50867.11 per sec.)
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > So puzzling - could you try -git + fix_weight_calc, as I think that is
> > > > > what Mike tested and proved good on his Quad.
> > > >
> > > > If he still has group scheduling enabled, my box agrees that there's a
> > > > regression. I got mysql running, and tested with group scheduling both
> > > > enabled and disabled, results attached. (for some reason, I can only
> > > > test up to 64 threads with mysql though)
> > >
> > > Hm, ok. Does the patch at hand improve or regress the group config for
> > > you?
> >
> > Oh, you want me to revert it and retest group?
>
> Yes, I guess that would be what I'm asking ;-)

(yeah yeah, ok, i went dense, results sent;)



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-09 10:29    [W:1.430 / U:0.476 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site