Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 9 May 2008 12:22:37 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: Reverting per-cpuset "system" (IRQ affinity) patch |
| |
* Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com> wrote:
> > No problem, I've been meaning to redo this whole series but somehow > > stuff got in the way and I never got around to it :-/ > > I'm actually totally surprised that it got in. Ingo applied Peter's > initial patch to his sched-devel tree but then ignored follow up > patches with fixes and stuff from me (I'm assuming that was because we > started discussion alternative options).
yes, there's been a lot of back and forth.
Paul/Peter/Max, what's the current agreed-upon approach to merge these physical resource isolation features into cpusets intelligently while still keeping the whole thing as usable and practical to down-to-earth sysadmins as possible? That is the issue that is blocking this whole topic from progressing.
> Anyway, my vote goes for reverting these series.
none of this is upstream yet (nor is any of this even near to being ready for upstream), so there's nothing to revert.
Ingo
| |