Messages in this thread |  | | | From | (Eric W. Biederman) | | Date | Thu, 08 May 2008 12:28:19 -0700 | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 10/11] avoid kobject name conflict with different namespaces | |
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> writes:
> On Wed, 07 May 2008 13:54:27 -0700,
> ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
>
>> > I thought that s390 also used it, but I don't see
>> > that usage in the tree anymore, perhaps they switched to something else.
>>
>> That is the device_move -> kobject_move case.
>
> Yes. bluetooth also uses it, IIRC.
Yes.
>> Very similar (and nice
>> if we can figure out how to combine them).
>
> Sounds like a good idea. I can test the _move() stuff (after I've
> managed to find some time to try this patchset...)
Do you remember if we have ever sorted out the race between _move
and module unload/directory teardown at the sysfs level?
Eric
|  |