![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, 7 May 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote: > and you're now done. You have your "mm_lock()" (which still needs to be > renamed - it should be a "mmu_notifier_lock()" or something like that), > but you don't need the insane sorting. At most you apparently need a way > to recognize duplicates (so that you don't deadlock on yourself), which > looks like a simple bit-per-vma. Andrea's mm_lock could have wider impact. It is the first effective way that I have seen of temporarily holding off reclaim from an address space. It sure is a brute force approach. | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-05-08 03:15 [W:0.703 / U:0.240 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||