lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 7 May 2008 16:38:51 -0700 (PDT)
FromLinus Torvalds <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 01 of 11] mmu-notifier-core

On Thu, 8 May 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> 
> At least for mmu-notifier-core given I obviously am the original
> author of that code, I hope the From: of the email was enough even if
> an additional From: andrea was missing in the body.

Ok, this whole series of patches have just been such a disaster that I'm 
(a) disgusted that _anybody_ sent an Acked-by: for any of it, and (b) that 
I'm still looking at it at all, but I am.

And quite frankly, the more I look, and the more answers from you I get, 
the less I like it. And I didn't like it that much to start with, as you 
may have noticed.

You say that "At least for mmu-notifier-core given I obviously am the 
original author of that code", but that is not at all obvious either. One 
of the reasons I stated that authorship seems to have been thrown away is 
very much exactly in that first mmu-notifier-core patch:

	+ *  linux/mm/mmu_notifier.c
	+ *
	+ *  Copyright (C) 2008  Qumranet, Inc.
	+ *  Copyright (C) 2008  SGI
	+ *             Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>

so I would very strongly dispute that it's "obvious" that you are the 
original author of the code there.

So there was a reason why I said that I thought authorship had been lost 
somewhere along the way.

		Linus


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-08 01:45    [W:0.513 / U:0.190 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans