![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, 7 May 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > As far as I can tell, authorship has been destroyed by at least two of the > > patches (ie Christoph seems to be the author, but Andrea seems to have > > dropped that fact). > > I can't follow this, please be more specific. The patches were sent to lkml without *any* indication that you weren't actually the author. So if Andrew had merged them, they would have been merged as yours. > > That "locking" code is also too ugly to live, at least without some > > serious arguments for why it has to be done that way. Sorting the locks? > > In a vmalloc'ed area? And calling this something innocuous like > > "mm_lock()"? Hell no. > > That's only invoked in mmu_notifier_register, mm_lock is explicitly > documented as heavyweight function. Is that an excuse for UTTER AND TOTAL CRAP? Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2008-05-07 22:21 [W:0.392 / U:0.040 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||