![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi! > > And this patch (by the author of the code himself) is the first time > > where it breaks. > > Very interesting analysis. What broke ? This CPU was never in the set > of supported ones at all. > > Anyway, you are welcome to review x86 code - it can definitely use > more eyeballs, but please try to inform yourself about the topic or > ask polite questions before yelling at people who contribute in a > very valuable way. Can we get rid of that copy&paste programming? They should have been fixed _before_ merging the patch, but better late than never... Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-05-07 23:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||