![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Le mercredi 07 mai 2008 à 22:10 +0200, Jan Engelhardt a écrit : > > >I.e., could unlink do the directory changes and then hand off the rest of the > >task to a kernel thread? > > Say you had one realtime application running that would do lots of new > writes after the unlink finished. When the unlink is put into the > background, you interleave the unlink operation with new writes, > probably causing needless seeks and therefore not hitting the deadlines > anymore. Why ? The writes are delayed, so could be the unlink operations. Xav -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-05-07 22:21 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||