Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 04 May 2008 22:00:05 -0700 | From | Ulrich Drepper <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 02/18] flag parameters: socket and socketpair |
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
> To me, it seems overriding 2nd argument is a too ad-hoc workaround, > and introducing new syscalls with flags is cleaner, e.g., > psocket(family, socktype, protocol, flags); > psocketpair(d, type, protocol, int sv[2], flags);
While I agree, you missed the initial discussion where Alan, DaveM, and Linus expressed preference for this overloading.
- -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkgelFUACgkQ2ijCOnn/RHSt1ACgx5ksBu0jMDqZDcG01PmJ4Jel EywAoKLQ8pEKcB+bY+vDzaOaZvLyPag0 =6iYM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |