Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 4 May 2008 10:49:34 +0300 | From | Adrian Bunk <> | Subject | Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches |
| |
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 09:36:14AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > Hi Adrian > > > It would be nice to know what was wrong with my suggestion. > > > You have done your share of kconfig patches so you have a good grip > > > on the problems we face. > > > So any input on how we can improve kconfig so we can actually provide > > > what people often expects or requests or need would be nice. > > > > > > I have so far not done any hacking on the core of the backend of > > > kconfig but if I one day find more than one hour in row where I can do > > > some kernel stuff I may actually try it out. > > > And then it would be nice to have a sketch ready how to solve the issues. > > > > > > I would though request you to start a new mail thread for this and > > > include both linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org and Roman Zippel in the loop. > > > > If you've sent a suggestion that included a description of the exact > > semantics you want to implement I must have missed it. > > > > Can you send me a pointer or a description of the semantics? > > I'll then have a look. > > I took the original idea and added a few more details. > Please see mail named "http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/4/18" > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/4/18
Thanks, I'll answer there.
> Sam
cu Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
| |