Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 4 May 2008 09:36:14 +0200 | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | Subject | Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches |
| |
> > Hi Adrian > > It would be nice to know what was wrong with my suggestion. > > You have done your share of kconfig patches so you have a good grip > > on the problems we face. > > So any input on how we can improve kconfig so we can actually provide > > what people often expects or requests or need would be nice. > > > > I have so far not done any hacking on the core of the backend of > > kconfig but if I one day find more than one hour in row where I can do > > some kernel stuff I may actually try it out. > > And then it would be nice to have a sketch ready how to solve the issues. > > > > I would though request you to start a new mail thread for this and > > include both linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org and Roman Zippel in the loop. > > If you've sent a suggestion that included a description of the exact > semantics you want to implement I must have missed it. > > Can you send me a pointer or a description of the semantics? > I'll then have a look.
I took the original idea and added a few more details. Please see mail named "http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/4/18" http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/4/18
Sam
| |