Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Sat, 3 May 2008 23:25:27 -0700 (PDT) | | From | dean gaudet <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: x86_64 asm implementation optimization | |
one of the more important details in evaluating these changes would be the
family/model/stepping of the processors being microbenchmarked... could
you folks include /proc/cpuinfo with the results?
also -- please drop the #define for R16 to %rsp ... it obfuscates more
than it helps anything.
thanks
-dean
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
> * Huang, Ying | 2008-04-25 11:11:17 [+0800]:
>
> >Hi, Sebastian,
> Hi Huang,
>
> sorry for the delay.
>
> >I changed the patches to group the read or write together instead of
> >interleaving. Can you help me to test these new patches? The new patches
> >is attached with the mail.
> The new results are attached.
>
> >
> >Best Regards,
> >Huang Ying
>
> Sebastian
>
|  |