[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v3]
    On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Miklos Szeredi <> wrote:
    > Michael,
    >> You omitted to answer my question, the last sentence below:
    > Oh, come on. Where in my last mail did I say that these fixes
    > shouldn't be applied?

    I didn't say you did. However, while saying "I understand your
    frustration", you simply ignored this question, which I would say was
    fairly important in the context, and asked me to write another version
    of the patch against your tree. My takeaway from this is that you
    attach a higher priority to seeing that your tree isn't broken, than
    to seeing that these bugs get fixed.



    Michael Kerrisk
    Linux man-pages maintainer;
    Found a bug?

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-05-31 07:31    [W:0.022 / U:9.852 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site