lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v3]
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:
> Michael,
>
>> You omitted to answer my question, the last sentence below:
>
> Oh, come on. Where in my last mail did I say that these fixes
> shouldn't be applied?

I didn't say you did. However, while saying "I understand your
frustration", you simply ignored this question, which I would say was
fairly important in the context, and asked me to write another version
of the patch against your tree. My takeaway from this is that you
attach a higher priority to seeing that your tree isn't broken, than
to seeing that these bugs get fixed.

Cheers,

Michael

--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-31 07:31    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans