![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thursday 29 May 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Could you check, please? The previous version didn't.
> >
>
> There's just one trivial reject against the PCI tree's
> pm-introduce-new-top-level-suspend-and-hibernation-callbacks:
Thanks Andrew ... in that case I'm not going to worry
about any "-next" issues for now.
- Dave
> ***************
> *** 293,299 ****
> if (suspend_ops->finish)
> suspend_ops->finish();
> Resume_devices:
> device_resume();
> Resume_console:
> resume_console();
> Close:
> --- 342,350 ----
> if (suspend_ops->finish)
> suspend_ops->finish();
> Resume_devices:
> + suspend_test_start();
> device_resume();
> + suspend_test_finish("resume devices");
> Resume_console:
> resume_console();
> Close:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-05-30 06:55 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||