Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 30 May 2008 21:43:59 +0200 | From | "Michael Kerrisk" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v3] |
| |
Miklos,
You omitted to answer my question, the last sentence below:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com> wrote: > Miklos, > > I already fixed most of the isues with utimensat() in my previous > version of the patch several days back, and that patch (probably > still) applies against current mainline. [...] > This is a bug. It is one of *several* bugs in the original > implementation of the utimensat()/futimens() interface. All of them > should be fixed. I have by now provided fixes for most of them. (Not > point 2 above, but with a little help that should be quickly fixed as > well.) At this point, I think you need to explain why you think those > fixes shouldn't be applied.
Michael
-- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html
| |