Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC][Patch 5/5]integrity: IMA as an integrity service provider | From | Mimi Zohar <> | Date | Fri, 30 May 2008 09:06:09 -0400 |
| |
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 20:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > - ima_fixup_inodes looks like it will race and crash against a > > > well-timed unmount. I expect you will need to bump s_count before > > > dropping sb_lock. See writeback_inodes() for an example. > > > > ima_fixup_inodes() is called once at initialization. > > What is "initialisation"? During initcalls? Are there even any files > in cache at that time? I bet we can arrange for the answer to become > "no".
Yes, during the initcalls. Is this possible even when using late_initcall(). IMA is dependent on the TPM being available, if it is being used.
Mimi
| |