Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 30 May 2008 11:22:19 +0200 (CEST) | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> | Subject | Re: MMIO and gcc re-ordering issue |
| |
On Fri, 30 May 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > Maybe we need another interface that does not do byteswapping but > provides stronger ordering guarantees?
The byte swapping depends on the device/bus.
So what happened to the old idea of putting the accessor function pointers in the device/bus structure?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
| |