![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, 2 May 2008 23:35:19 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 3 May 2008 15:45:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > > The following architectures are not in linux-next (and should be): > > > > alpha cris frv > > h8300 m32r m68knommu > > mips mn10300 parisc > > um v850 xtensa > > mips, m32r, parisc and xtensa do have git trees. The rest are mastered as > discrete patches in -mm. So, I was wondering if it would be worth while having subsections to a series file like: # NEXT_PATCHES_START [<label> [<base>]] # NEXT_PATCHES_END With <label> sections being logically separate enough that we can talk about them/drop them/merge them at different places etc. Or am I over engineering? :-) > Except for m68knommu, which pops unexpectedly out of the woodwork during > the merge window. I've asked that this be altered ;) Yeah, I saw that, thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-05-03 09:49 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||