[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: MMIO and gcc re-ordering issue
Trent Piepho wrote:
> Is there an issue with anything _besides_ coherent DMA?
> Could one have a special version of the accessors for drivers that
> want to assume they are strictly ordered vs coherent DMA memory?
> That would be much easier to get right, without slowing _everything_
> down.

It's better to be safe by default and then optimize the fast paths than
to be relaxed by default and hang the machine in some piece of code that
runs once a month. "Premature optimization is the root of all evil",
and what not.

> One could even go as far as to allow a driver to "#define
> WANT_STRICT_IO" and then it would get the strict versions. Add that
> to any driver that uses DMA and then worry about vetting those
> drivers.

See above -- if you must have a #define, then it should be WANT_RELAXED_IO.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-27 20:35    [W:0.232 / U:5.208 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site