![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sunday 25 May 2008, Thomas Renninger wrote: > On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 11:36 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > On Saturday 24 May 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Fri, 23 May 2008 19:44:57 +0200 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz > > > <arekm@maven.pl> > > > > wrote: > > > > thinkpad z60m, Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 2.00GHz. kernel from > > > > git from 1-2 days ago. > > > > > > > > Unfortunately it seems that suspend to ram/resume causes frequency > > > > to be limited to 800MHz only. I can't set it to 2GHz again :-/ > > > > > > > > scaling_max_freq is then 800000 and cannot be changed. > > > > > > > > reboot and the problem disappears until new suspend/resume cycle. > > > > > > > > cpufreq stuff is driven by acpi-cpufreq > > > > > > > > $ cpufreq-info > > > > cpufrequtils 002: cpufreq-info (C) Dominik Brodowski 2004-2006 > > > > Report errors and bugs to linux@brodo.de, please. > > > > analyzing CPU 0: > > > > driver: acpi-cpufreq > > > > CPUs which need to switch frequency at the same time: 0 > > > > hardware limits: 800 MHz - 2.00 GHz > > > > available frequency steps: 2.00 GHz, 1.60 GHz, 1.33 GHz, 1.07 GHz, > > > > 800 MHz available cpufreq governors: powersave, userspace, ondemand, > > > > performance current policy: frequency should be within 800 MHz and > > > > 800 MHz. The governor "performance" may decide which speed to use > > > > within this range. > > > > current CPU frequency is 800 MHz. > > > > > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/affected_cpus:0 > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_cur_freq:800000 > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_max_freq:2000000 > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_min_freq:800000 > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/related_cpus:0 > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies:20 > > > >0000 0 1600000 1333000 1066000 800000 > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_governors:powe > > > >rsav e userspace ondemand performance > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq:800000 > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_driver:acpi-cpufreq > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor:performance > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq:800000 > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq:800000 > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_setspeed:<unsupported> > > > > > > Thanks. Is this a newly-occurring bug or did earlier kernels do this > > > also? > > > > > > If it was newly added, do you know in which kernel version we might > > > have added it? > > > > I wasn't able to reproduce the problem on final 2.6.24 but was able to > > reproduce on final 2.6.25. Problem introduced somewhere between it seems. > > > > Note that 2-3 suspend to ram/resume cycles is needed to get into the > > problem. > > Sounds related to: > [Bug 374099] T61p speedstep problems (ondemand scheduler) > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374099 login/pass protected > > Miguel speaks from "good boots" and "bad boots". Actually I also got "bad boot" (so no suspend/resume was needed). > > Could you check whether the OS thinks it is too hot. > I described some basics how to monitor temperature and cpufreq (if > passive cooling kicks in) here: > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=387702#c13 Doesn't seem to be overheated [arekm@tarm ~]$ cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/*/{temperature,trip_points,state}; cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_{cur_freq,max_freq} temperature: 45 C critical (S5): 99 C passive: 95 C: tc1=5 tc2=4 tsp=600 devices= CPU state: ok 800000 800000 but still limited to 800MHz. > > Hmm, it may just have been fixed by this one: > commit e56a727b023d40d1adf660168883f30f2e6abe0a > Author: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> > Date: Mon Apr 28 15:13:43 2008 -0400 > > Miguel, Geoff: This is already in 11.0 for some time and in 10.3 for > some days. Unfortunately it doesn't fix the problem. The patch is in Linus tree for long time (so I guess I had it when initially reporting the problem) + I upgraded today to current git - the problem is still there. > Thomas -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-05-26 09:11 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||