lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: PostgreSQL pgbench performance regression in 2.6.23+
    On Fri, 23 May 2008, Mike Galbraith wrote:

    > It was running SCHED_BATCH, features=0...it needed features=0 as well to
    > achieve O(1) batch performance.

    I figured out how to run pgbench with chrt in order to get SCHED_BATCH
    behavior, but I don't understand what you mean by features=0 here. Since
    I didn't see the same magnitude of different just using batch that seems
    important, where does that get set at?

    I'm also curious what hardware your results are coming from, to fit them
    into my larger pgbench results context space.

    Got my 4-core system back on-line again today (found some bad RAM) and
    wanted to try another round of tests on that. Looks like you've defined 5
    test sets I should replicate:

    2.6.22
    2.6.22, batch
    2.6.26.git
    2.6.26.git, batch
    2.6.26.git, batch + se.load.weight patch

    Should I still be trying Peter's se.waker patch as well in this mix
    somewhere?

    --
    * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-05-24 01:23    [W:0.049 / U:31.044 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site