[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86: Switch apm to unlocked_kernel
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Alan Cox <> wrote:
> This pushes the lock a fair way down and the final kill looks like it
> should be an easy project for someone who wants to have a shot at it.

I would like to have a shot at this if no one else if currently
working on it. This would be my first attempt to graduate from
testing (and a few simple patches) to an actual functional change. I
would expect that the steps involved are:

- See what data is affected under the BKL
- See where else that data may be affected (including possible
parallel calls to the same path)
- Decide what locking is necessary
- Implement it (the easy part)

If this is about right (and I'm not missing anything major) - I will
give it a try and see where I get.

If, however, I have just proved that I do not have a full grasp of the
problem, or if someone else is already working on this particular path
- please let me know.

Kevin Winchester

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-23 13:39    [W:0.089 / U:11.144 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site